When it comes to dermal fillers, two names often pop up in conversations about facial firming: **Elasty F Plus** and **Radiesse**. Both are FDA-approved and widely used, but they work differently. Let’s break down how they compare in terms of performance, longevity, and suitability for specific concerns.
Starting with composition, **Elasty F Plus** relies on hyaluronic acid (HA), a naturally occurring substance in the skin that holds up to 1,000 times its weight in water. This makes it excellent for adding volume and hydration. Radiesse, on the other hand, uses calcium hydroxylapatite (CaHA) microspheres suspended in a gel carrier. These microspheres act as a scaffold, stimulating collagen production over time. While HA fillers like elasty f plus typically last 6–9 months, Radiesse’s collagen-stimulating mechanism grants it a longer lifespan—12–18 months in most cases. A 2022 clinical study published in *Aesthetic Surgery Journal* showed that 78% of Radiesse patients maintained visible firmness at the 12-month mark, compared to 62% for HA-based fillers.
Cost is another factor. On average, a syringe of Elasty F Plus ranges between $500–$700, depending on the provider and region. Radiesse tends to be pricier, averaging $700–$1,000 per syringe. However, Radiesse’s longevity might justify the higher upfront cost for those seeking less frequent touch-ups. For example, someone opting for Radiesse could save roughly 20–30% annually compared to biannual HA filler appointments.
But what about immediate results? HA fillers like Elasty F Plus create instant volume due to their water-binding properties, making them ideal for quick fixes before events. Radiesse’s effects are more gradual; while the gel carrier provides immediate lift, the collagen-building process peaks around 3–4 months post-treatment. Dermatologists often recommend Radiesse for patients with moderate volume loss or sagging skin, as the dual-action (instant lift + long-term collagen) addresses both surface and structural concerns.
Safety profiles are similarly strong for both. A 2021 meta-analysis of over 10,000 filler treatments found that adverse events like swelling or bruising occurred in 12% of HA cases and 9% of CaHA cases—minimal differences. However, Radiesse’s thicker consistency requires deeper injection techniques, which means it’s not ideal for fine lines around the eyes or lips. Elasty F Plus, with its smoother texture, is better suited for delicate areas.
Real-world examples shed light on preferences. Take Maria, a 45-year-old who tried Elasty F Plus for nasolabial folds. She loved the natural look but disliked the need for touch-ups every 7 months. Switching to Radiesse, she noticed slower progression of volume loss, stating, “It feels like my skin is rebuilding itself.” Conversely, 30-year-old Liam chose Elasty F Plus for marionette lines, praising its subtlety: “No one guessed I’d had work done—it just looked like I’d slept well.”
So, which firms better? If immediate results and lower initial cost matter most, Elasty F Plus is a strong contender. But for those prioritizing longevity and collagen stimulation, Radiesse’s 12–18 month duration and structural benefits often win. As Dr. Emily Torres, a board-certified dermatologist, puts it: “Radiesse is like a collagen investment account—it pays dividends over time.”
Still unsure? Consult a provider to discuss your goals. For instance, if you’re treating sunken cheeks, Radiesse’s lifting power might outperform HA fillers. But if hydration and fine lines are your focus, Elasty F Plus could be the smarter pick. Either way, both options deliver proven, science-backed solutions for firmer, younger-looking skin.